Background information How Germany is promoting fair supply chains
In 2011, the United Nations adopted the Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights (External link). They are intended to prevent human rights being violated by companies and they define the state’s duty to protect and corporate responsibility to respect human rights throughout gobal supply chains.
Initially, the German government relied on voluntary commitments in order to implement the UN Guiding Principles. In 2016, it adopted the National Action Plan for Business and Human Rights (External link) (NAP) and established a review mechanism. It was found that not enough companies were meeting their human rights due diligence obligations.
In the first company survey in 2019, only 400 of the more than 3,000 companies invited to take part completed the questionnaire. Only 20 per cent of these 400 companies were complying with the NAP requirements. In a second survey in 2020, 450 of the 2,250 companies invited to take part responded to the questionnaire; only 17 per cent of them were shown to be compliant.
The NAP envisages that the Federal Government will consider further action, up to and including legislative measures, if less than 50 per cent of companies are compliant with human rights due diligence obligations. In their coalition agreement the governing parties CDU, CSU and SPD agreed that legislative provisions would be put in place if companies’ voluntary commitments proved insufficient. This legislation was passed in June 2021.
With the supply chain law, the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights and the coalition agreement are now being implemented by the German government.
Our goal Fair and sustainable supply chains in Europe and worldwide
The goal being pursued by the German government continues to be a uniform European set of rules. It is seeking to influence EU legislation with its national law – also in the interests of German businesses.
Fair supply chains in Europe
Many companies are themselves calling for a binding legislative framework on corporate due diligence. Some countries, such as the United Kingdom, France and the Netherlands already have such a framework.
During its 2020 EU Council Presidency, Germany supported the initiative by EU Justice Commissioner Didier Reynders on binding provisions for corporate due diligence at EU level and an EU regulation on deforestation-free supply chains.
EU-wide regulation would provide all companies with legal clarity, legal certainty, transparency and a level playing field, helping also to eliminate potential ills on the ground in producing countries.
The German government is not, however, willing to wait until overarching European rules have been put in place. That is why it has passed a national due diligence act that is aligned with international standards like the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights and the OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises, which provide guidance and standards for responsible supply chains. This is setting standards and can provide support and significant input for planned EU legislation.
In addition, Germany is calling for human rights and environmental standards to be verifiably enshrined in EU trade agreements. This includes sanctions if the applicable sustainability chapters in trade agreements are disregarded.
Fair trade as the guiding principle of a new WTO
The World Trade Organization (WTO) must evolve into a fair trade organisation. The document establishing the WTO – the Marrakesh Agreement – already emphasises sustainable development and the protection and conservation of the environment as key goals. However, to this day, this triad is lacking in world trade. Even if companies destroy the environment or tolerate exploitative child labour in their production processes, they receive the same treatment under commercial law as companies that meet all ecological and social standards.
That must change as a matter of urgency. If someone violates international standards such as ILO core labour standards the Paris Agreement or the Convention on Biological Diversity, for instance, they need to lose their right to equal treatment.
Provisions must be put in place so that non-compliance with international standards leads to disadvantages in the EU single market. Germany already offers more support to developing countries and emerging economies that meet the various standards.
Seamstress in the textile factory of the Desta Garment company in Addis Ababa, which produces for a German retail chain, Ethiopia, 2.12.2019